More attempts
Agents map exposed systems, try leaked passwords and send phishing around the clock. How much an attacker can do no longer depends on how many people they have.
AI-vs-AI defense
An attacker with AI agents can probe thousands of companies at once, write a convincing lure for each one, and switch tactics as soon as one stops working. A team that reads every alert by hand can't keep that pace. Defense now needs automation that responds while the attack is happening and keeps up as it changes. That's how we work: the investigation runs at machine speed, the safe steps happen on their own, and a person stays on every decision that changes your systems.
An attack, start to finish
From a password spray to a contained incident and the write-up that follows.
What the video shows
What changed
The tools that help your team write code and answer email help attackers too. The difference shows up in three places.
Agents map exposed systems, try leaked passwords and send phishing around the clock. How much an attacker can do no longer depends on how many people they have.
When one approach gets blocked, an agent tries the next one. A rule written for last month's attack can be out of date before anyone reviews it.
Messages written in a colleague's style, in any language, about a project that's really happening. The spelling mistakes people were taught to look for are gone.
Where defense falls behind
Before anyone can say whether an alert matters, someone has to pull the sign-in history, the device activity, the mailbox rules and the earlier cases, then put them side by side. Done by hand, that's where the hours go, and it's the part an attacker's agents outrun.
Hiring more analysts helps for a while. It doesn't change the shape of the problem when the other side can add agents for the price of compute.
How we keep up
Our service and our software split the work the same way: everything that can safely run at machine speed does, and everything that changes your environment goes past a person.
Your own AI
An AI agent that can query your EDR and your identity provider holds the same access an attacker is looking for. If it runs on a permanent key, a stolen prompt or a stolen laptop can turn your defense into someone else's tool.
Explore OmniQuestions
Yes, for the parts where speed matters and a mistake is cheap to check: gathering evidence, linking activity and testing explanations. A person reviews the result, and anything that changes your systems waits for approval.
Messages, tickets and lookups run on their own. For containment, you agree up front which actions we can take straight away. Those still need a second person to approve them, and nothing outside that list happens without you.
No. We read from the endpoint, identity, email and cloud tools you already run, through your own Omni. Your logs stay where they are.
Yes. Steward and Omni are available on their own for teams that run their own SOC, and Automaton is in early access.
Bring a few recent alerts and we'll work them through Steward with you.